I've noticed that quite a few members, including some very prominent ones, don't appear on "Who's Online".

I think you're chicken shit.

"Brand new town but same old you"

When I check my private messages, I have one from Shelle saying she's willing to meet me, but she never called.

I think she's chicken shit.

The true Dadaists are against Dada.

And when I check who's online, I always see a guy using the name "FastChanges". I think there is someone here trying to impersonate me. I'm scared.

The true Dadaists are against Dada.

How do you know they're there if you can't see them?

Don't Blame Me, I Voted For The Silly Party

In reply to:

---

How do you know they're there if you can't see them?

---

Quite easy. As of now (2:30am) there are 8 registered users on this forum, but only 5 names showing. The rest are Invisible, or atleast their names are, and not their presence.

I hope I'm right with this...

Movie Sign!!!

I've noticed that quite a few members, including some very prominent ones, don't allow other members to view their profiles.

I think you're chicken shit.

Shane McGowan: I could have been someone
Kirsty MacColl: Well, so could anyone...

In reply to:

---

I've noticed that quite a few members, including some very prominent ones, don't allow other members to view their profiles.

I think you're chicken shit.

---

I agree.

Unless you are a celebrity as I am and don't want fans and stalkers knowing your contact details, I can think of no reason to hide your details, other than cowardice.

"Brand new town but same old you"

In reply to:

---

Unless you are a celebrity as I am and don't want fans and stalkers knowing your contact details

---

So that's what it's like to be famous...you spend your days tossing around anonymous insults to people on the internet.

You're truly an inspiration to the little people, Plumey.

...then I rose, wipin' the blunt's ash from my clothes and froze only to blow the herb smoke through my nose....

Man, does posting just to express my agreement with someone make me ddgz?

If so, then [I'm a stupid cunt]!!!!!!!!!!!!

Lotto: It's like a stock market for the poor! - The Onion

In reply to:

---

So that's what it's like to be famous...you spend your days tossing around anonymous insults to people on the internet

---

Not all my days, dear boy, just the occasional idle hour.

"Brand new town but same old you"

In reply to:

---

Man, does posting just to express my agreement with someone make me ddgz?

---

Take away that and there's not much left to you as a poster, puppy.

"Brand new town but same old you"

In reply to:

---

Take away that and there's not much left to you as a poster, puppy.

---

That would be a lot more amusing if it were in anyway true, Stu.

Lotto: It's like a stock market for the poor! - The Onion

In reply to:

---

That would be a lot more amusing if it were in anyway true, Stu.

---

Not me, Adrian. Wrong again. It must be nice being a simpleton, always thinking you're right, when you never are. No wonder you're such great chums with the twisted spine.

Stu
Get Bowie Back Downunder

In reply to:

---

No wonder you're such great chums with the twisted spine.

---

Man, I hope when I'm 80 I'm a pathetic, bitter cunt who gets a kick out of other people recieving serious injury. Then I'll feel like a fully rounded human being who my kids can look up to Just like you!

Though I guess the only time your kids look up to you is when your ugly bulk is bearing down on them late at night telling them to 'keep it a secret from mum'.

It's important for us to explain to our nation that life is important. It's not only life of babies, but it's life of children living in, you know, the dark dungeons of the Internet."

- President George W. Bush

In reply to:

---

Man, I hope when I'm 80 I'm a pathetic, bitter cunt...

---

No need to wait, Johnny, you appear to have achieved your purpose in life early.

In reply to:

---

...who gets a kick out of other people recieving serious injury.

---

Ever heard of karma, Johnny? As you reap, so shall you sew. Couldn't have happened to a more deserving fellow.

In reply to:

---

...bearing down on them late at night telling them to 'keep it a secret from mum'.

---

Ah yes, the old paedophile accusation, the puppy stock-in-trade. Your master did teach you well. Given your (and Adrian's and the twisted spine's) almost permanent fixation with the subject one can only assume that you've each been victims. Personally I'd have those scum executed or at least castrated, which would probably make you all bastards (in both the Biblical and the insult sense), or singing with high voices. Perhaps both? You'd think a commie would know better. Aren't you a teacher or somesuch, Johnny? Do the south Wales police know they've got a nonce working with kids?

Stu
Get Bowie Back Downunder

In reply to:

---

...who gets a kick out of other people recieving serious injury.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ever heard of karma, Johnny? As you reap, so shall you sew. Couldn't have happened to a more deserving fellow.

---

He insulted you multiple times. On an internet message board. Years ago.

"I'm simply not clicking on a link to foreskin.org. No, I'm not." - Emil

I'll slash them cold, I'll kill them dead
I'll break them gooks, I'll crack their heads
I'll slice them till they're running red
But now I've got the running gun blues

In reply to:

---

He insulted you multiple times. On an internet message board. Years ago.

---

Well, he made pathetic attempts at insult, but that's hardly relevant is it? It's his other crimes that are the basis of my beef. I know all you puppies like to pretend that it never happened, or that it was justifiable, but you know very well what the nature of the problem with the twisted spine (and his lieutenants, Johnny and Adrian) is. Hounding people away from his little fiefdom with baseless accusations, simply because they didn't kow-tow to his megalomania and had the gall to disagree with him.

Stu
Get Bowie Back Downunder

Svar på:

---

schizo's sig

---

Oh, I'm honored!
And I still haven't checked that site.

-I like Smashing Pumpkins.
-Are you kidding, I love doing that! (Steve Martin)

In reply to:

---

It's his other crimes that are the basis of my beef. I know all you puppies like to pretend that it never happened, or that it was justifiable, but you know very well what the nature of the problem with the twisted spine (and his lieutenants, Johnny and Adrian) is. Hounding people away from his little fiefdom with baseless accusations, simply because they didn't kow-tow to his megalomania and had the gall to disagree with him.

---

I guess maybe I haven't been studying my Twister Scriptures closely lately, cause I sure as hell don't know what you're talking about. For my sake, honestly, can you tell us all what exactly it is twister did to you on the internet, thousands of miles away from you that would, karmically speaking, warrant him serious physical injury?

I'm genuinely curious.

...then I rose, wipin' the blunt's ash from my clothes and froze only to blow the herb smoke through my nose....

In reply to:

---

How do you know they're there if you can't see them?

---

Good question.


London Bye Ta-Ta...

In reply to:

---

And I still haven't checked that site.

---

Don't.


"I'm simply not clicking on a link to foreskin.org. No, I'm not." - Emil

Because when you look at the whose online screen it tells you how many people are logged on and then lists all the visible members.

I haven't got a signature at the moment.

In reply to:

---

Because when you look at the whose online screen it tells you how many people are logged on and then lists all the visible members.

---

Thanks Alan, I do find it odd that members wish to remain invisable though? what is the point?


London Bye Ta-Ta...

If memory serves, it's the default setting, so probably a lot of newbies are invisible simply because they haven't gotten around to making themselves public.

Project Michelangelo | LiveJournal

In reply to:

---

If memory serves, it's the default setting, so probably a lot of newbies are invisible simply because they haven't gotten around to making themselves public.

---

Many thanks Sys, now I know why


London Bye Ta-Ta...

In reply to:

---

...can you tell us all what exactly it is twister did to you...

---

To me? Nothing. His pathetic attempts at insult are water off a duck's back to me. It's what he did to The Deuce that is at the root of every problem I've had with him.

And then his own subsequent romance, mirroring his very accusations against The Deuce, just hammered the hypocritical nails into the coffin of my utter disdain for him and all his faithfull lieutenants - like you.

Stu
Get Bowie Back Downunder

In reply to:

---

His pathetic attempts at insult are water off a duck's back to me. It's what he did to The Deuce that is at the root of every problem I've had with him.

---

Ah. So they slid right off, did they? But whatever it was he said to someone else on the internet was really, really terrible? And that's why you're taking pleasure in the fact that he got seriously injured?

That takes a whole lot of class, Stu. A whole lot.

...then I rose, wipin' the blunt's ash from my clothes and froze only to blow the herb smoke through my nose....

You really are a repulsive fuckwit, Stu.

And how exactly is his relationship with someone his own age 'exactly the same' as the deuce sleazing onto every underage girl on this message board before finally finding one dim enough to sleep with him?

And feigning cancer really is a lot worse than actually getting a broken back.

I hope you die alone, Stu.

Lotto: It's like a stock market for the poor! - The Onion

We all die alone, Adrian. I hope you die screaming.

There’s no point in my having this argument, yet again, with you puppies. Your blind devotion to the spine is admirable, I must admit, but I only posted here in response to one of your usual un-amusing barbs against me, I’ve not returned to engage in yet another twister is God / twister is a brain dead troglodyte debate.

Don’t have a nice life!

Stu
Get Bowie Back Downunder

No, there's no point you having this argument because everytime someone brings up real points to counter your vague generalisations, you're losing ground.

I like it how the mention of your name guarantees a post in no time flat, Stu.

You are pathetic. I hope your lonely death comes soon, and painfully.

Lotto: It's like a stock market for the poor! - The Onion

In reply to:

---

Don’t have a nice life!

---

*ahem*


CLEVER!!!!!!!



"I'm simply not clicking on a link to foreskin.org. No, I'm not." - Emil

In reply to:

---

I hope your lonely death comes soon, and painfully.

---

Go and and kick the shit out of him, then. It's not all that far is it? Just think, it'd be hilarious.

It's important for us to explain to our nation that life is important. It's not only life of babies, but it's life of children living in, you know, the dark dungeons of the Internet."

- President George W. Bush

In reply to:

---

Go and and kick the shit out of him, then. It's not all that far is it? Just think, it'd be hilarious.

---

Yeah, but R/R would have to watch his back for all of Stuart's friends..

Maybe not...Yeah, get out there man. Are you as hard as your countryman, Crowe?

Why do I get the feeling I just wandered into the nastiest online feud EVER!!!!?

Peeps I'd hit on: Remade/Remodeled,dice,Dara,Forgotten_Boy,guiltpup,schizo,SoulLoveChild,zigbot,
Dartagnan,Elsie,NomDeP,b_mardle,ghostlove
Peeps I'd take a hit out on: Marquis,CloverThePoet,TooDizzy,LadyGravedigger

'Cos you have .

Xenophobia begins at home.

OK, but I'm lost. I feel like I just walked in on a movie in the middle of the final scene. Someone care to PM me the back story?

Peeps I'd hit on: Remade/Remodeled,dice,Dara,Forgotten_Boy,guiltpup,schizo,SoulLoveChild,zigbot,
Dartagnan,Elsie,NomDeP,b_mardle,ghostlove
Peeps I'd take a hit out on: Marquis,CloverThePoet,TooDizzy,LadyGravedigger

In reply to:

---

Go and and kick the shit out of him, then. It's not all that far is it? Just think, it'd be hilarious.

---

Well, I do have 4 weeks of holiday starting on Friday.

If you guys covered the ticket, I'd be proud to do the shit-kicking.

And, unlike Russel Crowe, I won't even need a telephone

Lotto: It's like a stock market for the poor! - The Onion

Ah yes, true to twisted spine form the bully boys, unable to win the intellectual argument, resort to type.

See what happens when I ring the bell. >>DING<<. See Spot salivate. Good puppies. Roll over. Play dead. The end.

Stu
Get Bowie Back Downunder

In reply to:

---

Shelle two weeks ago: "Board history and old posters is much more enthralling to those who lived thru it."

---

In reply to:

---

Shelle today: "Someone care to PM me the back story?"

---

And you know, it wouldn't even be funny if it weren't Stu you were talking about in both cases! See, this just goes to show you that I'm always right about everything, 100% of the time.

Now, as a way of apologizing to me, please change your signature. It makes it much harder for me to pick out where people are talking about me when I do a search.

...then I rose, wipin' the blunt's ash from my clothes and froze only to blow the herb smoke through my nose....

In reply to:

---

there's no point you having this argument because everytime someone brings up real points to counter your vague generalisations, you're losing ground.

---

In reply to:

---

Ah yes, true to twisted spine form the bully boys, unable to win the intellectual argument, resort to type

---

Ah yes, Stu, as you have provided 'intellectual argument' that we were unable to counter.

You know how much of a hypocrite you are, right?

Lotto: It's like a stock market for the poor! - The Onion

In reply to:

---

You know how much of a hypocrite you are, right?

---

That's rich coming from the master's apprentice. So rich it's driving around in a gold Rolls Royce.

TheDeuce has an online romance with a girl (just) under 18 (who he's now about to marry) and he's a paedophile. The twisted spine has an online romance with a girl under 18 (who he's now shacking up with - or at least he's in the hospital down the road while his best mate looks after her) and he's the best thing since sliced Kiwi fruit. If they had an hypocricy Olympics you could get gold for New Zealand.

Stu
Get Bowie Back Downunder

In reply to:

---

If they had an hypocricy Olympics you could get gold for New Zealand.

---

You know what they say Stu, it takes one to know one.

In reply to:

---

TheDeuce has an online romance with a girl (just) under 18 (who he's now about to marry) and he's a paedophile. The twisted spine has an online romance with a girl under 18 (who he's now shacking up with - or at least he's in the hospital down the road while his best mate looks after her) and he's the best thing since sliced Kiwi fruit.

---

You seem to be forgetting a few things:

A) The age difference between the two couples (less than a year in Chris and Jossie's case)

B) The fact that Chris didn't go trying it on with every girl on the site before he finally got one. I admire theDeuce's admirable belief (and eventual success) in the law of averages, but it also sickens me.

C) Chris isn't a deceitful, cancer feigning, rennaisance fair going lowlife. He may be a lot of things, each of which we could debate for days on end, but he's not any of those.


You have a moustache, don't you stu? Just admit it.

Lotto: It's like a stock market for the poor! - The Onion

In reply to:

---

it takes one to know one.

---

Well at least you're owning up. Progress.

In reply to:

---

The age difference between the two couples...

---

Which is irrelevant. Underage is underage. Either it's wrong or it isn't. But of course, right and wrong are as blurred as truth and lies in puppy world, aren't they Adrian?

And it’s not as if TheDeuce was 20 years older than the girl. He’s now 25 and his fiancé is 21. I suppose a 4 year age difference seems like a lot when you’ve got the mindset of 9-year schoolyard bully, like you, but in the real world it isn’t. Also remember, while we’re on the subject of your hypocrisy, that in my country, and yours and Chris’s and Jossie’s, the age of consent is 16. Not that consent is all that relevant in terms of a relationship on the internet.

In reply to:

---

The fact that Chris didn't go trying it on with every girl on the site before he finally got one.

---

So the complaint is based on technique then, is it? God you're picky. I know in your fascistic little mind it would the perfect world if everyone was exactly the same (maybe we could all have matching armbands?). Here's a clue - the world is a much bigger place than the backwater confines of Christchurch. People differ. They way they behave differs. Not everyone loses their virginity to a sheep.

In reply to:

---

Chris isn't a deceitful....

---

Oh come on. Deep down in your heart of hearts where it really counts, even you know that's bullshit, don't you?

In reply to:

---

You have a moustache, don't you stu? Just admit it.

---

Once, in the 80s, when I had a Ken Livingstine fixation. It was a mistake. People make mistakes.

Or are you once again suggesting that I'm a paedophile? You are fucking obsessed. Look, if you want to come out as an incest victim, just bloody do it, okay? Stop dancing around your fear and shame. Your father should be made to face up to what he did to you. And then be executed.

Stu
Get Bowie Back Downunder

I don't think that I get the full story that is being fought about here - but this certainly is the most venomous exchange I have come across here for a while. Or ever. Interesting.

And I want to believe
In the madness that calls 'now'

It most certainly is interesting. I just wish the writting were a bit better. And the one performer is way too hammy. Still, interesting nontheless.

From A To Izzard...

In reply to:

---

See, this just goes to show you that I'm always right about everything, 100% of the time.

---

There's a difference between the inane blethering and bleating about stuff that happened here ages ago that only you remember that makes up, oh, let's say a bad 40% of your posts, and this sort of automobile accident entertainment.

In reply to:

---

please change your signature. It makes it much harder for me to pick out where people are talking about me when I do a search.

---

I had you pegged as the kind of pothead pighead slaphead nebbish who got off on throwing his weight around on the Internet and trying to bully females to do your bidding, but this is feeble even by your standards. Could you just not ignore posts from me in your search results? Or is that too much for your brain to process?

Peeps I'd hit on: Remade/Remodeled,dice,Dara,Forgotten_Boy,guiltpup,schizo,SoulLoveChild,zigbot,
Dartagnan,Elsie,NomDeP,b_mardle,ghostlove
Peeps I'd take a hit out on: Marquis,CloverThePoet,TooDizzy,LadyGravedigger

Anyway, when we want to bitch about Marquis we always spell his name wrong so it doesn't show in the searches

Xenophobia begins at home.

In reply to:

---

There's a difference between the inane blethering and bleating about stuff that happened here ages ago that only you remember that makes up, oh, let's say a bad 40% of your posts, and this sort of automobile accident entertainment.

---

No, there's not. That's the whole point. In both cases, we're talking about the same thing: Stu being Stu. Do you understand? I'll say it a third time: two weeks ago, when I told you you ought to look into the history of Stu and his dossier - not for any sort of 'education' but because I thought you'd find it amusing - you shot back with your holier-than-thou bitchy attitude. Now, two weeks later, you're openly asking people to PM you the history of Stu and his dossier. Don't you find that funny? I sure do. And as you've said yourself, humor is in the eye - or ear - of the beholder.

In reply to:

---

I had you pegged as the kind of pothead pighead slaphead nebbish who got off on throwing his weight around on the Internet and trying to bully females to do your bidding, but this is feeble even by your standards.

---

You're basing that on what now? Nothing? Calling you on your copious bullshit rather than rolling over in the face of your non-existant logic and unprovoked shit-slinging? I'm sure it makes you feel better to extrapolate misogyny on my part from my treating you as I would any other senseless doof, but it just doesn't add up; it's just an easy way for you to demonize those who disagree with your idiocy.

In reply to:

---

Could you just not ignore posts from me in your search results? Or is that too much for your brain to process?

---

Again, you're not too keen on picking up jokes.


...then I rose, wipin' the blunt's ash from my clothes and froze only to blow the herb smoke through my nose....

Nice - now we got two fights going!

"I'm simply not clicking on a link to foreskin.org. No, I'm not." - Emil

In reply to:

---

I just wish the writting were a bit better.

---

Get Bowie Back Downunder!
GBBD 2005 !!!!

In reply to:

---

There's a difference between the inane blethering and bleating about stuff that happened here ages ago that only you remember that makes up, oh, let's say a bad 40% of your posts, and this sort of automobile accident entertainment.

---

LOL.

Shelle, I’d been thinking for a few days (and composing the following in my head) that I should post a message to you to say this:



Shelle, as you’re a newbie I don’t know if you’re a real person or just another one of Monkeyboy’s or Strawman’s alters but, assuming that you are a real person, can I suggest that, instead of relying on someone else’s opinion, you discover things for yourself?

Try clicking on my screen name, 96dbFreak, at the top of this post. This will take you to my profile where you can then click on the Show all user’s posts link. If you then read, at random, through the posts I’ve made you can see that more often than not the nature of my posts is relevant to the topic under discussion, helping people with answers to questions, agreeing or disagreeing with an opinion expressed, expressing my own opinion, etc. Occasionally you might come across a post where I’m being nasty. In some cases, particularly nasty. If you look deeper, at the previous posts to which I’m responding, you’ll see that I’m responding in kind to the nastiness of others.

I was looking for a particular thread to illustrate a point the other day and I discovered that, before about July 03, Coffee Shop posts have been archived, so a lot of the roots of these arguments are no longer viewable. Nevertheless, the schoolyard bully behaviour of a certain clique (whom I’ve dubbed “puppies”) at this site should become apparent, particularly if you repeat the exercise by checking out their posting history.

You might also notice that there are large gaps in the frequency of my posts. I spent a long time trying to counter the behaviour of these people, but it’s an uphill struggle since they’re particularly belligerent. I began to find it almost impossible to make regular posts without the puppy gang launching some unprovoked attack. It gets boring after a long while. Many good posters have quit because they were bullied out of here by these people. Others are too afraid to speak out (publicly) for fear of being targeted by the bully-boys (and girls, in some cases). Eventually one gets bored with having to reiterate the same tired old arguments about the same bollocks by the same deadheads, so I gave up.

I still lurk occasionally and that was how I saw, in this thread, mention of my name: R/R suggesting that NomDePlume is me (he/she isn’t). I responded and the next thing we know one of the psychos is suggesting that I sexually molest my children. Do you know anyone with kids? How do you think they’d react if you, baselessly, suggested that about them? Is it any wonder I fight back? Of course, I’m being just as Pavlovian as they, responding to the ringing bell, but I occasionally (and especially after a long layoff) find it entertaining to push their buttons and see if they react in the expected manner (which of course they do). They do the same with me.

The “dossier” to which Marquis refers is a Word file that I have where I’ve recorded information (which alter is which, real names etc) about these people. It sometimes proves a valuable resource in countering their excesses. I work as a technical writer and business analyst, so recording useful information in second nature to me. The bully boys find this amusing, but I suppose if your working life consists of flipping burgers or taking cash at the checkout in a gas station or supermarket (not that there’s anything wrong with that), you don’t really need to take notes.

My point is that you shouldn’t rely on the opinions of others, but make up your own mind, independently. Don’t be a sheep (or a puppy). Don’t take their word for it, form your own opinion.



I was going to write that stuff to you, but I see from your most recent posts that you’re clearly capable of thinking for yourself and forming your own opinion. Good on you. But watch out for the puppies, they’ll probably think you’re me now.

Stu
Get Bowie Back Downunder

In reply to:

---

---

Cheek!

Stu
Get Bowie Back Downunder

In reply to:

---

My point is that you shouldn’t rely on the opinions of others, but make up your own mind, independently. Don’t be a sheep (or a puppy). Don’t take their word for it, form your own opinion.

---

Though if, at the end of your research, you should find that Stu is a reactionary bastard who takes pleasure in the serious physical injury of his online enemies, then that means that twister has gotten to you, even if you've never heard of twister. That's how Stu's mind works.

I don't think it works well enough to have concocted you, though, Shelle.

Stu, what do I have to do to get a peek at my file in the dossier? I imagine it's fascinating.

...then I rose, wipin' the blunt's ash from my clothes and froze only to blow the herb smoke through my nose....

In reply to:

---

…Stu is a reactionary bastard…

---

I’ll take that as a compliment.

In reply to:

---

I don't think it works well enough to have concocted you, though, Shelle.

---

Assuming that, by “concoct”, you mean “to invent an excuse, explanation or story in order to deceive someone”, then given that I’m suggesting that she avoid that very scenario by doing her own independent research, I’m inclined to suggest that it’s you who is attempting to “concoct” Shelle. Irony in action. What a tangled web the twisted spine has taught you to weave, Marquis. Good puppy!

In reply to:

---

Stu, what do I have to do to get a peek at my file in the dossier? I imagine it's fascinating.

---

Since I haven’t bothered with TW for quite a long time I haven’t actually looked in the dossier for ages, but as far as I recall I don’t think there’s anything about you in there. It’s mostly things like people’s real names, the ever-growing list of Strawman’s alter’s, links to threads where one of the twisted spine squad has said something particularly outrageous or contradictory, that kind of thing. Of course, if you want to volunteer information, say about your alters, I’m sure I could make good use of it.

Stu
Get Bowie Back Downunder

In reply to:

---

Assuming that, by “concoct”, you mean “to invent an excuse, explanation or story in order to deceive someone”, then given that I’m suggesting that she avoid that very scenario by doing her own independent research, I’m inclined to suggest that it’s you who is attempting to “concoct” Shelle

---

Not exactly. I just meant that Shelle doesn't seem like the kind of alter ego you'd create, as you've generally proven yourself more than willing to be combatative under your publically known username.

In reply to:

---

Of course, if you want to volunteer information, say about your alters, I’m sure I could make good use of it.

---

Gladly! As far as I can recall I've had three of them, none of which made more than ten posts. I guess I lack the time and commitment of Shelle's handler. One of them, possibly, might be remembered as a mild nuissance - truth be told, I annoyed myself with it and thus quickly euthanized it - but the others were surely as quickly forgotten by the collective mind of TW as the passwords to their accounts were forgotten by me. And no, none of them ever interacted with you.

...then I rose, wipin' the blunt's ash from my clothes and froze only to blow the herb smoke through my nose....

In reply to:

---

Not exactly. I just meant that Shelle doesn't seem like the kind of alter ego you'd create, as you've generally proven yourself more than willing to be combatative under your publically known username.

---

Ah-ha! I read it wrong. Sorry. I thought it seemed an odd thing to suggest. No, I did not concoct Shelle though I'm sure R/R will be otherwise convinced. Then again, he's mental so who cares?

Stu
Get Bowie Back Downunder

Stu, you are not very smart and I don't think you will last very long in this business. But best of luck to you anyway. Also I do not like you and cannot imagine how anyone could. Lastly, in case it has not been expressed with certainty, my opinion of you is very low. But best of luck to you anyway.

There is no glamour in that jungle of hell. - Asteroid

In reply to:

---

Since I haven’t bothered with TW for quite a long time I haven’t actually looked in the dossier for ages

---

Seriously, Stuart, I can always rely on you for a good laugh. Why don't you come here more often? You know you'd prefer it to this wanketry over there where it's obvious that you & everybody else is bored shitless.

In reply to:

---

It’s mostly things like people’s real names, the ever-growing list of Strawman’s alter’s

---

Oughtn't have been too testing a task considering I posted a list of 'em here a couple of months back, albeit, four of them were falsities. The question I'm asking myself is how does your knowing my alter egos affect your lifestyle?

Dossier

"I'd like to dedicate this song to my son, all our children and the children of the world......Please send your money in"

In reply to:

---

[EJ] I don't think that I get the full story that is being fought about here - but this certainly is the most . . .

---

. . . lame excuse for an argument I've ever clapped eyes on. At least in the 'classic' venomous exchanges with which I'm familiar people didn't interject with 'OMG!~ Peeps are so mean!!' or ''. It only so happens that I'm bored in some small part myself that I care to grace TW's intolerable presence with something that, by comparison at least, constitutes a fully-formed thought, so that I can leave you with the hope of enlightenment and remind you all why I was voted Mr TW in the first place.

On topic: I'm invisible because, to steal Shelle's neat division of the TW populace, I don't want the Peeps I'd Hit On hanging round unnecessarily when they see me replying to a post or PM in the mistaken belief I'm replying to theirs. That's all. Similarly, The Peeps I'd Take a Hit Out On have no business knowing what I'm doing at TW, and vice versa, really, except possibly in the case of the mods, where I understand that the caption 'Syisyo – Previewing Modifications to a Post' is one in particular to look out for.

Yeah, Loon is a true thread-weaver.

What's slightly more interesting is the behaviour of those I referred to as the 'illiterate tossers' in my first post of the evening who, despite my absence for some months, have confirmed my worst fears within several minutes of my reappearance. These are people who show no compunction in ignoring the well-substantiated arguments of others or the Guidelines of Posting (as illuminated several times by our highly conscientious mods) in order to justify their own rash of garbled, incoherent nonsense they pass off as 'truth' or even 'humour'. Having succeeded in scaring away the generation of decent (if mildly vituperative) posters who once inhabited the site, they have turned, somewhat predictably, on the few perfectly amiable Guardians of Light that remain – Marquis, to name just one.

Now, as it happens, Marquis is godlike in many ways – slow to anger, better than the mighty, rich in mercy, etc. What is particularly disturbing on this thread is how certain posters have 'ganged up' against their better judgement (though, admittedly, their judgement in disinterested cases is usually piss-poor too) with the intent of deriding and unsettling the wisdom of one so judicious and level-headed. Their ultimate goal is clear: they wish to shift the goal posts of what can be considered acceptable behaviour to suit their own preference of sub-substance discussion by

1) Posting Bucketloads of Crap. DumpyDogz has demonstrated quite effectively that volume is far more demoralising to the integrity of discussion than 'offensive' posts. While once someone so dim-witted would've been banned anon, he's spawned a horde of illiterate morons in his wake that are equally impossible to control.

2) Exploiting Fallacious Arguments. Both Stu and SLC are/were regular contributors to WankerWorld and would positively delight in diluting discussion to that level. While this ought to speak for itself, the common hallmarks of their debating, er . . . 'technique' are easy to connect with the above:

i) They post to each thread a million times (like Dogz).
ii) They post off-topic, chatty posts, such as smilies and PMs. (like Dogz).

Furthermore, I'm disturbed by this recurring pattern 'puppy' imagery among the site's truly tragic posters. Ever since Dara confessed to leathering one of the end of Dun Laoire pier, there has been a surge of animal molesters infiltrating the site, with similarly perturbing results. If, as one can assume, Stu intends the 'puppy' tag to be truly disparaging, it follows perfectly naturally that Stu, too, dislikes and murders puppies for sport.

R/R probably hits near the mark with paedophile accusations, but has overlooked the most glaringly obvious rebuttal in how The Deuce used to boast about how his minions of drooling adolescent sympathisers would be 'legal' any time soon. In light of the above, we'll assume Stu considers this natural and perfectly legit.

That's about all for now, except to ask why the fuck has Shelle got Elsie_the_cow as one of her references?


Sweetness, sweetness I was only joking when I said
I’d like to smash every tooth in your head

I've been ignoring this thread for a while and just opened it for the first time right now. I'm not going to take sides in something that doesn't concern me but I just want to interject that I'm really glad that I only know the personal life of 1.75 TW'ers.

I "probably know how to treat a woman."

In reply to:

---

why the fuck has Shelle got Elsie_the_cow as one of her references?

---

Elsie's cool. Don't fuck with Elsie.

"I'm simply not clicking on a link to foreskin.org. No, I'm not." - Emil

In reply to:

---

Stu, you are not very smart and I don't think you will last very long in this business. But best of luck to you anyway. Also I do not like you and cannot imagine how anyone could. Lastly, in case it has not been expressed with certainty, my opinion of you is very low.

---

Oh dearie me, a complete non-entity has a low opinion of me, whatever shall I do?

Er.....what "business"?

Stu
Get Bowie Back Downunder

I'm just a lonely teenage girl looking for all the wrong kinds of attention. I am sorry that I bothered you.

2005 Vicious Post Count: 1

You're barking up the wrong tree with me, dear. You want one of those nonces like Re-sheep/Re-shagged or White Pissn or JohnnyManiac.

Stu
Get Bowie Back Downunder

In reply to:

---

I responded and the next thing we know one of the psychos is suggesting that I sexually molest my children.

---

To be fair, you responded in a particularly (one could say overly) bilious manner - knowing R/R was, as you say, a "psychopath" (or something to that effect), you should have predicted an argument was on the way. Plus, having such an obvious alter be the only one to use such a distinctive figure of speech does raise questions, especially when said alter never seems to be around at the same time as you. And tends to dislike a lot of the people you dislike.

Not that I'm implying anything, mind. Just trying to put things into perspective.

"I'm simply not clicking on a link to foreskin.org. No, I'm not." - Emil

If you're talking about the NomDePlume thing, I assure you that's not me. I may have several alters but that's not one of them.

As for responding to R/R in a bilious manner, it's par for the course in terms of his communication toward me. When has he ever responded to a post I've made without being exceptionally obnoxious? Though the particular psycho in this case was JohnnyManiac, not R/R (though as twisted spine disciples they're interchangeable).

Stu
Get Bowie Back Downunder

In reply to:

---

JohnnyManiac

---

Wow. With material like that every antipodean journal of note must be clamouring for you to scribble for them. What is it that you 'write' exactly? The daily specials on the restaurant blackboard?

It's important for us to explain to our nation that life is important. It's not only life of babies, but it's life of children living in, you know, the dark dungeons of the Internet."

- President George W. Bush

That would be your speciality, wouldn't it, Johnny?

Leek soup
Leek pie and chips
Leek and caerphilly soufflé and chips
Leek ice cream

Stu
Get Bowie Back Downunder

In reply to:

---

You might also notice that there are large gaps in the frequency of my posts. I spent a long time trying to counter the behaviour of these people, but it’s an uphill struggle since they’re particularly belligerent. I began to find it almost impossible to make regular posts without the puppy gang launching some unprovoked attack. It gets boring after a long while. Many good posters have quit because they were bullied out of here by these people.

---

This is certainly something I can relate to.

Thanks for all that, 96dbfreak.

And don't worry: I like to make up my own mind on things.



Lycurgus, Numa, Moses, Jesus Christ, Mohammed, all these great rogues, all these great thought-tyrants, knew how to associate the divinities they fabricated with their own boundless ambition.
Marquis De Sade

In reply to:

---

Calling you on your copious bullshit rather than rolling over in the face of your non-existant logic and unprovoked shit-slinging?

---

Unprovoked? Hey, buster, you're the one who has been jumping all over my posts since I started posting. I'd scarcely have noticed you otherwise. Alternating between "You have no logic" and "You're not even a real person". You don't so much sit on the fence when it comes to me as to jump manically from one side to the other, attempting to occupy both together.

In reply to:

---

Again, you're not too keen on picking up jokes.

---

Funny how you seem to believe your jokes devoid of humor when they're turned around on you.

Again, both sides of the fence.




Lycurgus, Numa, Moses, Jesus Christ, Mohammed, all these great rogues, all these great thought-tyrants, knew how to associate the divinities they fabricated with their own boundless ambition.
Marquis De Sade

In reply to:

---

Are you bipolar or something?

---

You say that like it's a bad thing.



took my pills today but i don't feel better in a funny sort of way

In reply to:

---

Alternating between "You have no logic" and "You're not even a real person". You don't so much sit on the fence when it comes to me as to jump manically from one side to the other, attempting to occupy both together.

---

You're absolutely right about that, Shelle. See, I sort of got an alter ego vibe from you early on, but I figured I'd try giving you the benefit of the doubt about being for real. As the evidence started piling up against this being the case, I admit to some terrible waffling, and I'm truly sorry.

Now, of course, I'm all but convinced I know what your deal is, and so the only question which remains is how it'd be most fun to interact with you in the future.

And there are also my horses, which are very important.

In reply to:

---

...I sort of got an alter ego vibe from you early on...

---

Marquis, after I facetiously suggested that Shelle might be one of Monkeyboy's or Strawman's alters earlier, I went and looked at her profile and, from there her online journal. If she's an alter then it's a pretty elaborate attempt at deception.

Jeez, and you call me paranoid.

Stu
Get Bowie Back Downunder

Is it not intriguing that Shelle's online journal begins 4 days after she (and I use the feminine pronoun respectfully--as one does in the case of drag queen preference--as this poster has presented as a female) registered at TW? Surely Stu, you do not doubt that there exists at least one TWer with copious free time on hir hands, and lack of thoroughly engaging hobbies who might construct such an "elaborate" deception.



took my pills today but i don't feel better in a funny sort of way

I don't doubt that it's possible, but it just seems a little too elaborate. The coincidence of her arrival here and her commencement of a livejournal soon after might simply be put down to her having recently acquired internet or maybe broadband access or having discovered new places to go.

Maybe she learned of livejournal from exploring this site where numerous narcissists advertise their own mental meanderings?

Stu
Get Bowie Back Downunder

Jesus, "Stu," you really think Shelle's not an alter?

Don't get me wrong, I give her "the benefit of the doubt," inasmuch as it really makes no difference to me whether I'm interacting (or crushing on) a real person or an alter ego... I absolutely adore Shelle and I absolutely adore adoring Shelle; in the context of TW, it makes absolutely no difference whether she is the product of biology or of imagination.

That being said, however, if you are going to make a distinction, seriously, how fucking obvious does it need to be?

2005 Vicious Post Count: 3

In reply to:

---

That being said, however, if you are going to make a distinction, seriously, how fucking obvious does it need to be?

---

I don't understand what that means.

But take a look at her livejournal. Would one of the alter creators here really go to that much trouble to make us think they're real when they're not? If so then they're even more psycho than I'd imagined.

Stu
Get Bowie Back Downunder

From her first post, I always thought Shelle was White Prism.




GFried: What aspect of your personallity do you think makes you post at a David Bowie message board?
Dara: For me it's pretty much an interest in David Bowie.

you mean there are invisible people staring at me!shit man! that's some scary stuff!

I love children so much that I wanted to cry but didn't want to smear the make-up.

In reply to:

---

96bdFreak Would one of the alter creators here really go to that much trouble to make us think they're real when they're not?

---

Beats me. I guess some people here geniunely have nothing to do with their lives other than create false identities and torment me (such as 96dbFreak - note he/she has created a false identity in my name to stir up trouble, such is the conniving nature of these puppies).

96dbFreak does have a point, however, about the authentication of one's account by supplying a live journal. That is why, against my better judgement, I've linked mine in my profile. God knows, the puppies will probably use it against me.

Stu
Get Bowie Back Downunder

This thread's only funny post was posted on 06/10/05 at 07:20 PM.

I guess I'm just gonna bozo everybody who posted before/after that, makes life that much easier.


Share Zi Love

In reply to:

---

From her first post, I always thought Shelle was White Prism.

---

I've held this theory for a while as well. I mean, the guy doesn't post much around here anymore, so he has the time. They both share similar styles. Plus, they both tend to like and dislike the same people without giving much explanation as to why.


"I'm simply not clicking on a link to foreskin.org. No, I'm not." - Emil

In reply to:

---

But take a look at her livejournal. Would one of the alter creators here really go to that much trouble to make us think they're real when they're not?

---

There are six posts there, over three months or so. If you enjoyed something (and I imagine writing Shelle posts are quite enjoyable for the creative mind behind them), would it really be that much trouble to do it twice a month?

But anyway, please start posting on the rest of the boards more. I've decided that I like you now.

2005 Vicious Post Count: 3

In reply to:

---

Would one of the alter creators here really go to that much trouble to make us think they're real when they're not?

---

Yes.

Again, she's not me but if I set out on the goal to create a really believable alter I would do everything Shelle has done. And probably posted in about the same way (or Shelle's author - like guiltpuppy, I don't really care either way).

TW ALIVE IN '05!!

I never said that. Shelle sounds nothing like that boring assfuck whiteprsm. I like Shelle because her posts give me the opportunity to talk about myself and how awesome I am.

Share Zi Love

In reply to:

---

96dbFreak does have a point, however, about the authentication of one's account by supplying a live journal. That is why, against my better judgement, I've linked mine in my profile. God knows, the puppies will probably use it against me.

---

Twitters' journal doesn't seem to have been updated for ages. The lazy bastard's probably off lying on his back somewhere.

BTW, what a handsome man you are.

Stu
Get Bowie Back Downunder

In reply to:

---

From her first post, I always thought Shelle was White Prism.

I've held this theory for a while as well. I mean, the guy doesn't post much around here anymore, so he has the time. They both share similar styles. Plus, they both tend to like and dislike the same people without giving much explanation as to why.

---

Well, that would be an elaborate deception then, juding by the pathetic and unconvicing way White Prism tried to drag me into this argument earlier, and the fact that Shelle has be on her "hit on" list (for very good reason)

Get Bowie Back Downunder!
GBBD 2005 !!!!

Well I've got to tell you, I see my alters hitting on and making friends with posters I wouldn't give the time of day to all the time! Pisses me off!

what's the point of cracking up all because of shepherd's pie?

2 faced indeed LOL


Get Bowie Back Downunder!
GBBD 2005 !!!!

Just imagine what it is like when your alters bozo you? It is degrading.




You should not underestimate people, not everybody is as thick as you.

This is where the magic happens baby!