Teenage Wildlife

IMPORTANT: Use your registry nickname as your username when logging in to Conversation Piece!


Free for All
   >> Site Douchebag
Thread views: 28395 *Threaded Mode

Pages in this thread: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | (show all)
PHOENIX
(funny little bunny)
08/22/06 11:00 AM
Now, I wish you had actually said that before now new [re: Bamboo7]  

In reply to:

Excited? Hardly. I was just curious as to how deeply it affected you seeing as I had to read that line in every thread I opened, sometimes in alternate colors!


Well why didn't you say that silly? I thought you were referring to my "Staying away from me apparently" comment.

I wanted to see what kind of "hell yeah!" comments I could get to the view in my signature and what fun I could have from that. Zero fun apparently because all that happened was Dogz had a bizzare dig at me for upsetting Shelle (?????).

I don't take great stock in signatures and change them around every 5 posts or so these days. I'm just gonna stick to something simple and random - if there is one thing I'm bad (even more than others) at it's signature composing.

As for PHOENIX being schizophrenic. Ohhh baby, he's got much more psychologically wrong with him than that. That's why I retired him from service a year or so ago.

Next time, clarity from me you and everybody. Yeah hell that's right! Clarity on the house boys, I'm pickin' up the tab!

WARNING : Post may contain sarcasm and jovial silly business. May be harmful to moronic TWers.

diamondogz74
(freecloud)
08/22/06 03:35 PM
My first and last post in this bizzare thread new [re: PHOENIX]  

In reply to:

Dogz had a bizzare dig at me for upsetting Shelle (?????).


If you'd been around earlier on TW ( than leaving it for so long to return ) you would have noticed my total devotion to the poster called "shelle" I will defend and stand up for her always, shelle is an extremely clever and attractive lady, I voted her to be Miss Teenage Wildlife, now you know my reason for my so-called dig at you.


London Bye Ta-Ta...

ani the gun
(acolyte)
08/22/06 03:48 PM
Boys who want girls to be dogs who do boys like... new [re: diamondogz74]  

In reply to:

If you'd been around earlier on TW ( than leaving it for so long to return ) you would have noticed my total devotion to the poster called "shelle" I will defend and stand up for her always, shelle is an extremely clever and attractive lady, I voted her to be Miss Teenage Wildlife, now you know my reason for my so-called dig at you.


does Effee know you've found someone else to be your fag hag? Or does your little beloved lick pussy too and join in? Awww I bet it's just the cutest little bleach blond daisy chain....


Edit:

I wanna be your only possession

Edited by ani the gun on 08/22/06 04:00 PM (server time).



Shelle
(stardust savant)
08/26/06 03:17 PM
Re: I'm a no limits kinda gal new [re: Atonalexpress]  

In reply to:

Where have you been Shelle?


I think the question is where haven't I been. Or to put it in terms that even Hannibal the Can'tBall might understand, I've been toing and froing in my usual manner from pillar to port, airport to hotel room, casual affair to exotic encounter, in the name of b usiness and pleasure.

Also, I can't seem to work up much of a TW appetite these days. Seems like nearly all my favorite posters are posting hardly or not at all these days, and I can't warm to the B team.

More importantly, how the Hell have you been, Tones?

"Do we all think you're a bitch now? Good God no girl! The straights are all trying to gage how long before it's decent to hit on you, and the gays are thinking how wonderful, she has more time to go shopping with me!"- Ryan cheers me up


Atonalexpress
(acolyte)
08/26/06 05:11 PM
Re: I'm a no limits kinda gal new [re: Shelle]  

I thought perhaps you put the Keith Jarrett recommendation on a tape loop, forgot about TW, and had an epiphany. I'm doing fine now that my 8 to 4 career is over and only composing occupies my time. It's very rewarding. My publicist put out a press release the other day and Mirror of the New in Honolulu features an hour of my music Sunday night. PM me if you want a CD of the radio show.

MySpace

Oh, on the topic of limits and quality of posts etc... Let there be no limits. People should be free to express themselves. It's all entertainment anyway (for better or for worse) and for those interminable boring posts, we can all just skip over them so easily.


schizophrenic
(acolyte)
08/27/06 01:42 PM
Re: I'm a no limits kinda gal new [re: Atonalexpress]  

A question: if Dogz keeps editing his posts to respond to everything anyway, doesn't that defeat the purpose of the post limit in the first place? Are we honestly any better off now than we were before?

"Vasectomy is your friend." - RabbitFighter

Pablo-Picasso
(one of the new wave boys)
08/27/06 01:53 PM
Re: I'm a no limits kinda gal new [re: schizophrenic]  

Well unless you look for them, you won' really be aware of it.

-------------------------------------------------------
I'm not a piece of teenage wildlife

Auntie Prism
(cracked actor)
08/27/06 03:41 PM
Now that I'm suitably bored new [re: K]  

So, I've just spent the last hour watching WBC videos on YouTube, interspersed (for my own sanity?) with my reading of Lovecraft's stories of Cthulhu, and now that my mind's numb enough I'm ready to have another shot:

In reply to:

K: Funny, I did not notice there was a thread related to the hacking in the mods forum. Nor did I know Billy's IP had been banned, until after the banning had taken place.


In that case, where did the caring, compassionate Ohro go? It seems desperately out of character for her to ban Billy without first sending him a sympathetic PM, encouraging him to mend his ways? I took the original comment to mean, perhaps wrongly, that Adam and Ohro had consulted one another; however, I'll take your word for it, for the moment.

Alas:

In reply to:

Actually, all mods have the ability to ban users. We have just made a point of not doing so unless we all agree.


So if no threads or PMs were made between mods, Ohro went against 'official procedures' twice; once in banning Billy at her own discretion, and again in writing privately to Dogz saying that he would not be banned.

May I suggest that all such decisions in future follow the procedure outlined by K, quoted above, i.e. the mods are all in alignment privately before a verdict is decided upon?

K, you complained in your post that the Mods are criticised no matter what decisions they make, and this is to some extent true. What I find disturbing, however, is not the judgements themselves (which, if I may say so, are nevertheless toss), but the lack of consistency.

If the mods had all agreed on their private 'Should we ban Dogz now?' thread that Dogz should not have been banned, despite going over his 5-a-day limit, I would've been less critical than I am at seeing one mod acting on hir own initiative. I broached the same problem on Adam's guidelines about posting one's genitals; at the end of the thread, Adam, EJ and Ohro were all shown to be in complete disagreement, making the guidelines a farce.

In reply to:

K: Actually, since we're dealing in quotes, here's what Ohro wrote in the mods forum:

"i just went ahead & banned the IP right away because to me, this is a pretty serious offense. not that the banning would prevent the alleged thief from trying again, only from posting. right?"


Er, so there was a thread in the mod forum after all?

I sense a pattern emerging here:

1) Ohro screwed up her mod duties and tried to cover up by getting K to provide an alibi; however
2) K screwed up and lied also.

Psst! The sweepstakes say EJ's next!

In reply to:

Ohro: Actually, you commented after I had already posted the ban limit. And besides, wasn't this comment in reference to my *need* to confer with other mods before I act?


As I read it, the ban limit was only imposed in your following post; I was replying to the suggestion of whether five was a suitable figure, to which I raised my objection that Dogz can't count to five. My second point -- that the lower the limit the better -- was in agreement.

In reply to:

Ohro: Thank you dude, for admitting you understood this was tongue-in-cheek. You scared me for a minute there.


Yes, it was mostly tongue-in-cheek, though the joke only works if you were semi-seriously implying that K should not have given out a custom title on a whim. Which, given the subsequent fiasco over Strawman's title, suggests that you do indeed consider these titles to be weighty things.

The broader point, however, is that even if a single mod did err, as you put it, NONE of the decisions discussed in thread are IRREVERSIBLE.

Naturally, I had plenty more to say, some of it facetious, about how custom titles are handed out, about how they're the TW equivalent of being knighted and those who wear them proudly below their handles are the perpetrators of HolyCowism -- especially those 'premature' owners -- though I'm reluctant to post yet again in site feedback. I'll leave you with a final thought, however: While I agree that *all* the early adopters of customer titles have deserved them, have any of them received them without blatantly ass-kissing the admin &c. ?

[neon]I'm not trolling; I'm moderating. [/neon]

RabbitFighter
(acolyte)
08/27/06 04:01 PM
Fight the real enemy! new [re: Auntie Prism]  

You're only blaming proxies Jism!
It's time to see Tati as the manipulative hag that she is!

stop smiling at me
treat me unpleasantly



KModerator
(thunder ocean)
08/27/06 05:26 PM
Re: Now that I'm suitably bored [re: Auntie Prism]  

In reply to:

Er, so there was a thread in the mod forum after all?

I sense a pattern emerging here:

1) Ohro screwed up her mod duties and tried to cover up by getting K to provide an alibi; however
2) K screwed up and lied also.


Yes, there was a mods forum thread about the account hackings. However, it was created three days after Ohro banned the first offender and consisted of only Ohro saying "oh, by the way I banned this IP for trying to heist a password" and me later replying that I had banned another IP for the same reason. There was no conversation, I do not know if Adam or EJ ever even read the thread.

Mind you, I never said there wasn't a thread in the mods forum about the password heisting. What I did say was that, unlike what you seemed to think, password heisting was not the subject of the "pictures! of marquis' bottom?, please" thread and hence any conversation related to that thread (including your "freedom of information" thread) are not proof to whether or not the mods conferred about banning the IP adresses. Which they didn't do, and even the thread in the mods forum about password heisting was created a day after the last post was made to the freedom of information thread. Adam or EJ posted nothing related to the password heisting on the mods forum. There was no conferring, Ohro acted solo.

Incidentally, how am I defending her if I'm in fact accusing her of working against the guidelines?

"Are we making any progress?"
"None whatever," said Hercule Poirot. "That is interesting."



Pages in this thread: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | (show all)
*Threaded Mode
Jump to

Teenage Wildlife Davie Bowie | Email Us! Forums powered by WWWThreads v5.1.5perl

Teenage Wildlife Home Page Bowie's music Info on Bowie Other Media Have your say! Search the Site Help me!


Toolbar (Interact)

Etete Systems