Teenage Wildlife

IMPORTANT: Use your registry nickname as your username when logging in to Conversation Piece!


Free for All
   >> Site Douchebag
Thread views: 28528 *Threaded Mode

Pages in this thread: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | (show all)
ohramonaModerator
(acolyte)
08/15/06 04:19 PM
Cookies are trivial new [re: anisette*]  

In reply to:

you take more than five cookies from the cookie jar and no tv for you tonight"


That's cute. Although I love Supernanny, my household is run more like this:

"Touch my pot and I'll slap you, bitch, yo!"

''skeezix. Do not speak to your mother like that!'

There's no limit on cookies.

In reply to:

you imposed the rule yourself, and now you're taking it back?!


Can you believe it! Not only am I compassionate, I'm flexible!

In reply to:

come to think of it, you probably should have conferred with adam & k on all of these matters.


Oh yeah, and add to my resume "Executive Decision Making Skillz".



xxoo -ohro

anisette*
(wild eyed peoploid)
08/15/06 04:29 PM
Re: It's like fucking Xanadu man! new [re: RabbitFighter]  

Well, have at it Rabbit...sadly i don't feel much hope myself...

KEEP PHOENIX, BAN DOGZ!KEEP PHOENIX, BAN DOGZ!KEEP PHOENIX, BAN DOGZ!
dogz days counter: 6 days

anisette*
(wild eyed peoploid)
08/15/06 04:35 PM
Re: Cookies are trivial new [re: ohramona]  

ok, well, give him an inch and he'll take a mile! and another mile and another mile...

KEEP PHOENIX, BAN DOGZ!KEEP PHOENIX, BAN DOGZ!KEEP PHOENIX, BAN DOGZ!
dogz days counter: 6 days

schizophrenic
(acolyte)
08/15/06 04:39 PM
Re: Cookies are trivial new [re: ohramona]  

I'm with ohramona on this one. I really, really, really wish this didn't result in PHOENIX leaving (again), but I honestly think she made the right decision.

There, I said it.

"Vasectomy is your friend." - RabbitFighter

Cookie_Monster
(grinning soul)
08/15/06 05:00 PM
Re: Cookies are trivial new [re: ohramona]  

In reply to:

Cookies are trivial


How can you say that!

esst
mehr
cookies!

Auntie Prism
(cracked actor)
08/15/06 05:10 PM
Between my last two posts, Ohro got her ass tanned new [re: schizophrenic]  

In reply to:

Schizo: I really, really, really wish this didn't result in PHOENIX leaving (again), but I honestly think she made the right decision.


Except that she didn't though, did she? Ohramona FUCKED UP, hence:

In reply to:

ohrodoh!: edit. Okay, he tried to rectify it but wasn't able too. This one will slide cause I already said it would.


Which is precisely why she's in the mess she's in now. Ohro never checked that Dogz's deleted post did indeed leave an icky skidmark on the 'inbred' thread and has subsequently been back-peddling with 'Oh, I'd let you have another chance. ' And then she proceeded to lie several times about going out on a limb with wayward decision making, ergo:

In reply to:

ohro: You didn't complain when I made the decision to instate a limit without conference.


I MYSELF conferred with YOU on its appropriateness for the very fact it was impossible for a dingbat like Dogz to miscount a number as low as five ESPECIALLY in less than a week into his restriction - as opposed to the trickier seven. On this point and all the other conditions to be met surrounding Dogz's ban, the forum was unanimous.

In reply to:

You didn't complain when I banned b_mardle's IP without conference.


This is also a lie. My 'Freedom of Information' thread divulged the fact from several posters that various moderators had indeed conferred on this topic, as had the administrator Adam.*****

In reply to:

You didn't complain when K gave Wraith2 a custom title without having met the customary requirement --not only without conference--but in direct opposition to my response. Neither did I, I'm sure you noticed.


Well, here's a clue: Posters in the past (dukewhite & dice, et al.) have claimed custom titles before hitting the 5000 target without opposition from fellow posters. No one SERIOUSLY considers the duty of conferring titles to be the equivalent of deciding whether to ban a poster, despite it being among your most important duties.

And actually, yes you did complain with about as much seriousness as the situation warranted.

In reply to:

X bozos removed


Ah, I see Pablo's had a spate of activity. No doubt my response here is jeopardised by ignoring his carefully crafted arguments, so instead I'll opt for a blanket rebuttal:


In reply to:

ghostlove:


Jeez, the defence rests its case?

Naturally, I wanted to make this post much longer, exposing the intricacies of whatever arguments were being had, but there weren't any. However, I'll provide a summary version:

1) Ohro FUCKED UP
2) Ohro LIED
3) Ohro gets to cosset herself with a flood of Dogz's forward emails and tales about Pablum's rare 'Loving the Alien' vinyl and Shake 'n' Vac disasters.

**** I've been asked to clarify this point, on which I quote anisette:

In reply to:

I forwarded the IP address to Adam and the ohso honorable ohro, and they banned the IP.




[neon]I'm not trolling; I'm moderating. [/neon]

Edited by Auntie Prism on 08/15/06 05:39 PM (server time).



th0mas
(acolyte)
08/15/06 05:15 PM
Cookiemonster, was it really about counting to 5? [re: ohramona]  

His recent output has not been worse than the average of this forum. Also there are at least two threads (phoenix' thread in this forum, the movie poster thread and now also this one) which are more or less about him. Post-limit or not, I doubt one can demand that someone does not take part in an open discussion about himself.

The whole limit is just about keeping him from ruining every thread or falling back into his annoying posting behavior. So far it seems to work, so I give a fuck about one post more or less.


Liest das denn keiner außer mir?

KModerator
(thunder ocean)
08/15/06 05:29 PM
My new sig is fitting. [re: Auntie Prism]  

In reply to:

This is also a lie. My 'Freedom of Information' thread divulged the fact from several posters that various moderators had indeed conferred on this topic, as had the administrator Adam.


We had? It did?

Funny, I did not notice there was a thread related to the hacking in the mods forum. Nor did I know Billy's IP had been banned, until after the banning had taken place.

Also, it is my opinion that Ohro made the right decision in not banning Dogz, especially as he did try to rectify his error (be it that he's an idiot).

And it's interesting that no matter what the mods do, we're always doing a bad job. First when we ban legitimate offenders (people making dozens of posts per day, all containing the same sentence), people are complaining that we're limiting the freedom of speech on this site. Then when we don't ban a poster at the request of a small number of posters, we're doing a bad job again.

I'm not saying that most of Dogz's posts wouldn't be crap, because they are. But amongst them are also some legitimate contributions to the site, and in my opinion banning him for an offense he actually tried to rectify would be going too far.

On the other hand, if he does the same thing again tomorrow...

"Are we making any progress?"
"None whatever," said Hercule Poirot. "That is interesting."

Edited by K on 08/15/06 05:37 PM (server time).



KModerator
(thunder ocean)
08/15/06 05:50 PM
Re: Between my last two posts, Ohro got her ass ta [re: Auntie Prism]  

In reply to:

I've been asked to clarify this point, on which I quote anisette:


I do not know the exact circumstances, but my impression from what Ohro wrote in the mods forum after banning the IP is that she did not communicate with Adam about the subject either and it was in fact solely her own decision. Adam has not said anything on the subject so I do not know for certain.

Additionally, contrary to what Prism seems to think, the Pictures! of Marquis' bottom?, please -thread was not about the password thieving attempts.

Actually, since we're dealing in quotes, here's what Ohro wrote in the mods forum:

"i just went ahead & banned the IP right away because to me, this is a pretty serious offense. not that the banning would prevent the alleged thief from trying again, only from posting. right?"

"Are we making any progress?"
"None whatever," said Hercule Poirot. "That is interesting."

Edited by K on 08/15/06 05:56 PM (server time).



Marquis
(fetch a priest)
08/15/06 06:17 PM
I am become death: the defender of Dogz [re: K]  

Well, not exactly. Let's just say instead that ohro could spend a week taking potshots at my dead grandparents and I'd still give her benefit of the doubt. Though I think I'd support her decisions in this matter even if she wasn't a kickass mamajama.

I'm trying not to become one of those posters I always hated on the Classic Dogzbanning threads (i.e. "Well, Dogz doesn't really bother *me* so I don't see what the problem is"), and I'm sure as *shit* not gonna take sides in a bitchout amongst a handful of my all-time favorite posters.

So yeah, I'm just gonna say again that I feel ohro's leniency on a one-post violation of a rather-strict-in-the-first-place posting limit was the best thing to do.

This is what a poor person do for a scholarship
He turned around, got a face full of hollow tips
But don't be mad
He died for the flag




Pages in this thread: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | (show all)
*Threaded Mode
Jump to

Teenage Wildlife Davie Bowie | Email Us! Forums powered by WWWThreads v5.1.5perl

Teenage Wildlife Home Page Bowie's music Info on Bowie Other Media Have your say! Search the Site Help me!


Toolbar (Interact)

Etete Systems