Just curious. I'm not saying I'll try to get banned. Not at all. I'm just, you know, shootin' the shit so to speak. I'd like to have some idea, even if there is no set limit here.

I'd also like to know what it takes to get a permanent ban and what it takes to get banned for x amount of time. Just makin' conversation you know. I mean, this is a freaky place with nutbags and morons. But there must be something.

Like, what would happen if I started posting thread after thread of porn constantly. Would I get the boot for good? What if I started attacking every TWer here non-stop?

I know. What's the best and most spectacular way to get banned?

This is not a Dogz issue, or a Bamboo issue. This is just...hmmm...curiosity. It's nice to know ones limits.

Third post is like "Just shut up already. We get you're trying to show us how clever and wonderfully flip you are."
Why didn't somebody tell me??!!??

Well, momonanically harassing a fellow poster in new thread after new thread doesn't seem to get you banned, did it? So you'll have to come up with something more original.

It's LABRYNTH, idiot!

Digs at Phoenix aside, what did it take for Alexz to get banned way back when?


From memory, it was not something too awful but, then again, we're talking 5 and a half years ago and when I was 16 I think I was less easy to shock than I am now.

Deny your culture of consumption;
This is a culture of destruction

In hindsight it doesn't seem that awful. He wrote "All retards should be killed" in a post, then when he received some bashing for it he edited his post and claimed he never wrote it and everyone who said so was lying.
After that, most of his returns here were about inventing silly alters that really mushed up the boards with nonsense, they were banned in a matter of a few days, but that's partly because they were identified as Alecz.

It's LABRYNTH, idiot!

Okay, Emil (or Wabbit, if you're reading) why exactly was thomaswood banned?

I'm reasonably au fait with the reasons behind Altoid's banning -- a hundred variations of 'eat shit, adam', etc. But, again, if we're talking about the number of offences, it seems he was given the heave-ho quickly (relative to Dogz at least).

In reply to:

---

momonanically

---

Emil? Leave the mormons out of this.

In reply to:

---

most of [alez's] returns here were about inventing silly alters that really mushed up the boards with nonsense, they were banned in a matter of a few days

---

So he was banned for flooding, was he?

[neon]I'm not trolling; I'm moderating. [/neon]

Conspiracy against the Woodtangclan, it's as simple as that. I'm sure Altoid would agree...

stop smiling at me
treat me unpleasantly

The Woodster was banned?

What fucking genius was behind that call?

Deny your culture of consumption;
This is a culture of destruction

In reply to:

---

Okay, Emil (or Wabbit, if you're reading) why exactly was thomaswood banned?

---

he asked to be banned to prove his devotion to someone. a girl. not me. he's an old-fashioned guy.

I wanna be your only possession

That was me, of course.

NEXT!

What does momonanically mean?

WARNING : Post may contain sarcasm and jovial silly business. May be harmful to moronic TWers.

You mean you don't know?

Here, take your pick

1. (Mathematics) (of a function or quantity) varying in such a way that it either never decreases or never increases.
2. speaking or uttered in a monotone.


London Bye Ta-Ta...

he meant mononeucleosically.

I wanna be your only possession

In reply to:

---

You mean you don't know?

---

Surprising aint it? This whole Momonomoicaistic episode means :

1. My dictionary is a heap of shit

2. I'm gonna use this word constantly in the next few weeks to annoy the hell out of friends and family

WARNING : Post may contain sarcasm and jovial silly business. May be harmful to moronic TWers.

right... not only was aleczandah (or however he spelled his username) banned for some really off kilter remarks (which i highly doubt he meant seriously), it was moreso the constant flood of obvious alter-egos that did him in for good. it was tough to keep track of all of them, and so many posters were banned even for suspicion, i believe.

we (and by "we" i mean "i") like to call that the cold war of TW. was that really six years ago?

hands up, WHO WANTS TO DIE!

In reply to:

---

Okay, Emil (or Wabbit, if you're reading) why exactly was thomaswood banned?

---

He ain't on the list of banned users, so if he was banned at some point (I don't remember if he was), he ain't anymore.

"Are we making any progress?"
"None whatever," said Hercule Poirot. "That is interesting."

you're absolutely right. he's not banned anymore. read his profile. even banning himself couldn't win him the girl's cold cold heart, so he came back and tried again with Mousey.

I wanna be your only possession

In reply to:

---

K: he ain't anymore

---

Eye know. I didn't mean to imply that he was *still* banned.

In reply to:

---

ani the gun: he came back and tried again with Mousey.

---

Say it ain't so!

I feel obliged to write more, given it's my 1400th post, and I like to use multiples of 100 as checkpoints to see whether I can still string a sentence together, but I figured I'd rather tie-up these few boring ends than describe the time I rogered Peter the Gorilla.

[neon]I'm not trolling; I'm moderating. [/neon]

Good questions. What are the limits of banishment and what are the rules of inclusiveness?

Anyone know?

MySpace

No.

And I want to believe that a light's shining through somehow

Sorry, misspelled it.

Main Entry: mono·ma·nia 
Pronunciation: "mä-n&-'mA-nE-&, -ny&
Function: noun
Etymology: New Latin
1 : mental illness especially when limited in expression to one 
idea or area of thought
2 : excessive concentration on a single object or idea 
- mono·ma·ni·ac  /-nE-"ak/ noun or adjective 
- mono·ma·ni·a·cal  /-m&-'nI-&-k&l/ adjective 
- mono·ma·ni·a·cal·ly  /-k(&-)lE/ adverb   

I could have said "obsessively".

It's LABRYNTH, idiot!

Something corrupt is going on in TW. A poster, one who is highly respected by most members is banned, for the sole reason that they want to be banned. Is this right? I don't think so, this poster had not done anything to justify this banning, yet banned they were.

Obviously not one of the inner circle of 'the friends of the mods'.

Another poster, one who spouts some of the most politically correct prose on the board, but who has lately started posting a most unpolitically correct picture, most recently not even as a link, is not banned.

Obviously one of the inner circle of 'the friends of the mods'.


One member asked for a custom title, with around 200 posts less than the required amount is refused, despite the fact that he brings laughter to this board.

Obviously not one of the inner circle of 'the friends of the mods'.


Another member with almost half the required amount of posts to warrant a custom title, gets one without a second thought, despite their posts being the humorous equivalent of a Russian novel.

Obviously one of the inner circle of 'the friends of the mods'.


-------------------------------------------------------
I'm not a piece of teenage wildlife

In reply to:

---

One member asked for a custom title, with around 200 posts less than the required amount is refused, despite the fact that he brings laughter to this board.

Obviously not one of the inner circle of 'the friends of the mods'.

---

If there is one true friendship between a mod and a user it is Straman's an mine. And he knows it. He is just a little too emotional from time to time when it comes to dissense - but don't we all have our weaknesses? I think we do.

And I want to believe
In the madness that calls 'now'

There is also another poster (Emil) who is a close friend of a mod (me) that requested a custom title (via PM) but was no given one.

"Are we making any progress?"
"None whatever," said Hercule Poirot. "That is interesting."

In reply to:

---

There is also another poster (Emil) who is a close friend of a mod (me) that requested a custom title (via PM) but was no given one.

---

Thought it might be best if I explain that. In all fairness I thought I had the same kind of reason that Wraith2 had - been around since 2000 and mostly contributed sensible posts - but I guess there are a few tens of us so I kind of understand I was refused.

It's LABRYNTH, idiot!

My advice to you, Pablo, is to take the situation incredibly seriously and work yourself into an emotional frenzy over it. Don't let me down.

I just want to hold your pretty hand; the rest of you can be dissolved in acid

No, my usual response to you is;



-------------------------------------------------------
I'm not a piece of teenage wildlife

But if you're bored, then you're boring....



I wanna be your only possession

Well, we are two of a kind Ani, always threatening to leave but then coming back.......

-------------------------------------------------------
I'm not a piece of teenage wildlife

Pabs, you can google "yawn" all day long and it's not going to convince a single goddamn person that you take a laid back, disinterested approach to...well, to anything!

Your posts ooze handshy defensiveness and, of late, you've developed a predictable hairtrigger response for anyone you think is mocking you. I say "anyone you think" because your massive collection of insecurities make it impossible for you to let any comment go by if it could be in any way interpreted as a slight to you. This prompts the patented, "fuck you, prick!" response and we all have a chuckle.

I appear to be on the enemies list owing to some encounter that I can't recall but, truth be told, I would have no interest in airing out your more piteous qualities for all of TW to see if you were to keep your fool mouth shut regarding me. But I know you won't do that because your whole posting strategy looks toward a day when there stands not an opponent of Pablo; when all enemies have been buried under a pile of stern excoriations and you are left to skip unmolested through the land of milk, honey and TWers who actually respect you.

I hope you like solitaire.

I just want to hold your pretty hand; the rest of you can be dissolved in acid

you gave him a lot to read and ponder this time. it's taking longer than the usual chuck woolery 2 & 2.

I wanna be your only possession

Ani, I did it because I care about Pablo. I want him to have a pleasant TW experience, but he needs to understand that he can't get that from tryin' to step to me. Hell, if I didn't care about Pablo, I would've just dropped in one of these:



and left it at that.

I just want to hold your pretty hand; the rest of you can be dissolved in acid

thank god that link doesn't work here at work.


I wanna be your only possession

Yeah, fortunately I can get away with posting that kind of filth because Sysiyo and are, like, totally BFF.

I just want to hold your pretty hand; the rest of you can be dissolved in acid

You really need to relax, you don't believe this stuff means anything do you?

-------------------------------------------------------
I'm not a piece of teenage wildlife

In reply to:

---

Sysiyo and are, like, totally BFF.

---

Big Fiendish Fags?

godhatesfags.com

Don't be a big Rocket Scientist Baby, Emil. I offered you a custom title.



Little boys who eavesdrop deserve to hear the truth, and the truth is usually devastating.

Hmm... what's a custom title worth if everybody is getting one...

But what about a new colour for my username? Can I have a black one?


Liest das denn keiner außer mir?