Teenage Wildlife

IMPORTANT: Use your registry nickname as your username when logging in to Conversation Piece!


Free for All
   >> Site Douchebag
Thread views: 9739 Previous threadView all threadsNext thread*Threaded Mode

Pages in this thread: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | (show all)
Remade/Remodeled
(acolyte)
11/03/06 05:46 AM
Moqito is a witch and I have seen him cast spells new [re: Monkeyboy]  

In reply to:

I might reconsider this position if Dogz were to offer a public apology



Dude, you've just established that you think he is one of the most dishonest people you've ever encountered. Would you believe him if he apologised?

Because he will if he thinks it'd prevent him from being banned.

Remember, this is someone who on one hand makes (redundant) threads about how the site is dying, how much he loves it and that we need to do something to 'save' it, and on the other threatens legal action against the site's creator, an act that would no doubt hasten it's demise.

The apologies of someone like that mean nothing to me.

Disclaimer: All opinions stated and allegations made in the preceeding do not represent the views of Evan Torrie, the Moderators or the members of the TW Message Board as a whole

EJSundayModerator
(heroic dolphin)
11/03/06 06:06 AM
Re: A question for the TWers new [re: ziggfried]  

In reply to:

Something about this whole thing stinks. (...) EJSunday tells us that he knows nothing about the Dogz issue and we have to ask K and Adam...


The only thing that stinks is my memory. As said before in the other thread I am sure Adam informed me about those threats of legal action as he did with the other mods. As far as I can recall I didn't take all that stuff any serious whatsoever - and I still don't.

Dogz was on a rampage and came up with typical idiocy, a behaviour which I have noticed with other folks here as well. Though one may exchange the word "idiocy" for the term "senseless aggression" in those cases.

So what do we have to deal with here? A TW member who is renowned for his utter lack of intelligence is spitting out a threat which he will never be able to persue seriously in any way, and certainly doesn't even intend to. Should we ban him for that? Or should we use this incident as an excuse to ban him for all the other nonsense he posts in abundance on TW?

A fully justified ban of dogz would be at hand if he was still considering the idea of legal action, or in reverse if he does not take back those words he sent to Adam.

And I want to believe
In the madness that calls 'now'


KModerator
(thunder ocean)
11/03/06 06:16 AM
End new [re: EJSunday]  

The way I see it, we've got multitude of reasons to ban him:

- Aggression towards other users (including the mods)
- Blatant disregard of logic
- Blatant disregard of grammar
- Blatant disregard of privacy
- Flooding
- Attemps to influence mod decisions via private messages
- Threat to sue the site
- Being the most annoying person on the planet

With all this in mind, I have just banned the user diamondogz74.

Post deleted by a fascist.

Persilot
(acolyte)
11/03/06 06:29 AM
Re: A question for the mods new [re: Monkeyboy]  

Well the bastard has had that many lives that we should have considered calling him Catz instead of Dogz.

If he is indeed gone for good this time, then this could well be the start of something beautiful. Then again, the damage that DD74 has caused may already have gone too deep. I think we can only really justify having banned him for good, so long as TW doesn't now slide into an empty nothingness where nobody posts and we just talk about the good old days of Dogz bashing.

Indeed, I'll just leave you with something Dogz once said to me in a PM... "I try so bloody hard to keep this site alive and not sink into the realms of boredom such as BWW." Lets prove him wrong...


"Don't see what I do not want to see,
you don't hear what I don't say.
Won't be what I don't want to be,
I continue in my way."

Edited by Persilot on 11/03/06 06:33 AM (server time).



RabbitFighter
(acolyte)
11/03/06 06:52 AM
Christmas came early this year new [re: K]  

I want to have sweaty buttsex with you, RIGHT NOW!

Culture, alienation, boredom and despair



KModerator
(thunder ocean)
11/03/06 06:59 AM
Re: Christmas came early this year new [re: RabbitFighter]  

But certainly. Shall I come to your place or will you come over to Helsinki?

A map of the world that does not include Utopia is not worth glancing at.
- Oscar Wilde on banning Dogz

Strawman
(chameleon, comedian, corinthian and caricature)
11/03/06 07:11 AM
Turn your speakers up for this one.. new [re: K]  







Remade/Remodeled
(acolyte)
11/03/06 07:21 AM
No old friend, a new beginning new [re: K]  

Thank you Sys, from the bottom of my heart.

I am toasting a shot of tequila in your honour as this was the first website I ever visited and it has taken up a lot of my time and thoughts over the last 6 or so years. I have grown up here and honestly believe that your decision is one great step towards the revitalisation of these boards.


So, salut K and thank you very much

Disclaimer: All opinions stated and allegations made in the preceeding do not represent the views of Evan Torrie, the Moderators or the members of the TW Message Board as a whole

PHOENIX
(phunny little bunny)
11/03/06 07:48 AM
Dawn new [re: K]  

Sys, I love you.

Am I suspended in gaffa?

th0mas
(acolyte)
11/03/06 08:06 AM
Re: End new [re: K]  

While it would be possible to find arguments against those reasons

In reply to:

- Aggression towards other users (including the mods)
- Blatant disregard of logic
- Blatant disregard of grammar
- Blatant disregard of privacy
- Flooding
- Attemps to influence mod decisions via private messages
- Being the most annoying person on the planet


the threat of sueing the site is something completly different. This is not about free speech anymore. It is just consistent to ban him in order to keep harm from site and owner, just like banning monkeyboy's headline was.

I just have a problem with any mod being allowed to ban how he likes to. Isn't there any agreement among the mods needed anymore? I don't think decisions made in such an unclear way are really improving the site on long sight. So perhaps the other mods could clear that up by taking some position to get sure there is a consense about that decision.


Liest das denn keiner außer mir?


Pages in this thread: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | (show all)
Previous threadView all threadsNext thread*Threaded Mode
Jump to

Teenage Wildlife Davie Bowie | Email Us! Forums powered by WWWThreads v5.1.5perl

Teenage Wildlife Home Page Bowie's music Info on Bowie Other Media Have your say! Search the Site Help me!


Toolbar (Interact)

Etete Systems