Teenage Wildlife

IMPORTANT: Use your registry nickname as your username when logging in to Conversation Piece!

   >> Views and Questions
Thread views: 13025 *Threaded Mode

Pages in this thread: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | (show all)
(byroad singer)
07/07/08 10:47 AM
Bowie In Berlin - The Book You Don't Need  

What would you expect from a book titled "Bowie in Berlin"?

What would you expect from a book which claims to be "painstakingly researched"?

Just as I most here would probably expect a book about Bowie's life in Berlin, rich in detail and safe in knowledge. Neither is the case.

Thomas Jerome Seabrook's book strangely enough wastes a third of its pages before first reaching the German city in question. Of course we need to know about Bowie's career twists and turns from before the Berlin days but the simple timeline the book follows makes that part redundant to anyone who has ever read any of the good Bowie bios which have been around for years.

If Thomas Jerome Seabrook had indeed painstakingly researched he should at least have found one new and interesting idea and approach to Bowie's Berlin days to start the book with. And then later weave in the necessary background from Bowie's LA time. But as he hasn't painstakingly researched (more later) we first go through the whole cocaine, fridge urine, Cracked Actor etc. encyclopedia before we even get a glimpse of Berlin. If you need a summary of what happened to Bowie in the US in the 70s, this is neat work, but I bought a book which promised more in its title.

When we eventually get to Berlin there is absolutely nothing new in this book. Nothing. Apart from a few wrong facts about the place, that is.

A painstakingly researched book about Bowie In Berlin, released in 2008 should at least try to shed some new light on what happened. Or at least light from a different angle. Not this one. A brief list of what I would have done if I was the author of a book under such a promising title:

- Take a look at Hauptstrasse 155 now and desrcibe it.

- Try to find out who owns the house and maybe get lucky to find a witness from those days.

- Speak to people like (Tangerine Dream's) Edgar Froese about the music from those days.

- Speak to a Berliner like Blixa Bargeld (who was unknown then) about what Berlin was like in those days. About the front feeling which apparently influenced Bowie's work so much.

- Wander through the Hansa Studios and have a word with Eduard Meyer, the once important engineer there.

- Check out Gail Anne Dorsey's tour diary which at some point deliverd a little insight in Bowie's lasting infatuation with Berlin. Or maybe even speak to her personally?

- Check with the legendary punk places like the still existing SO36, which apparently was Iggy's favourite club.

And so on. Just the quick ideas.

All that would help to gain a picture of what a place Berlin was then and why it so much appealed to Bowie. An insight. Instead we get a copy & paiste fest which reproduces all the well known formulas. Wall, Can, beer, bars etc. - you name it, it's there. But nothing that goes any further, 30 years later. Actually the Christiane F. book reveals more about the Bowie-Berlin-Bowie realationship than all that has been said in any Bowie book.

Berlin in the 70s and 80s was an exceptional place. In good and bad ways. It was wild. None of that comes across with Thomas Jerome Seabrook. Because he doesn't know about it. I actually doubt he has ever been here.

Thomas Jerome Seabrook's lack of knowledge about Berlin is embarassing in some facts.

He claims that Bowie's flat was within walking distance of the Hansa Studios and thus the Berlin Wall. A keen walker might do the distance in less than 40 minutes but certainly not the Bowie of those days. Not quite walking distance, I suppose. Similarily wrong is the claim that Schöneberg, the district where Bowie's flat was located, was an area of mainly non-german or even Turkish flair. It wasn't. That part of Schöneberg was certainly working class and had its fair share of migrants of all kind but Bowie was not inhabitating the typical Berlin areas like Kreuzberg or Neukölln, where you would find especially Turkish influences on everyone's life. And where the Wall was indeed next to you. I actually never understood why Bowie chose that dull part of Schöneberg for himself and not the far more vibrant and intense Kreuzberg. The book doesn't bother though.

Thomas Jerome Seabrook's painstakingly researched facts reach their lowest low when he claims that Bowie summoned Iggy's touring band for rehearsals in the "fairly big city of Babelsberg on the outskirts of Berlin". Good Lord, you can hardly put more bullshit in one sentence. Firstly, Babelsberg is no city of its own but a part of Potsdam, which itself is indeed a fairly big city on the outskirts of Berlin, but had one major problem at the time: It was part of East Germany! As the author may have heard there used to be that wall around Berlin - so Bowie, his band and crew would have had to travel over the border into East Germany every day for rehearsals. With their visas ready as Potsdam lay outside of Berlin, which made regular visits even more difficult than travelling from West to East Berlin. And even more absurd is the thought of the East German regime allowing a bunch like that to practise unhindered for a tour of the Western World on their tight fist ruled side of the iron curtain. Crazy.

I suppose Thomas Jerome Seabrook has copied that "fact" as well from somewhere else and I think I know where the original mistake stems from: The true rehearsal studios were on the UFA ground in West Berlin. The UFA also ran studios in Potsdam-Babelsberg where indeed loads of movies were made in the early 20th century and which came back to life after the Wall came down. So apparently someone confused them. Still someone who writes a book titled "Bowie In Berlin" should know better. Much better. And if the band had indeed practised in Babelsberg that would have made headlines all over the world. East and West.

Minor mistakes in the book are easy to be found as well. Following Thomas Jerome Seabrook Bowie has a song under the title "Hold On To Yourself" which I'd like to hear. He also claims that Iggy's "The Passenger" has a two-chord riff, which it hasn't and disses the marvellous "Turn Blue" as a song Bowie and Iggy shoud better have left alone. Urgh.

And there is probably more to be found.

On the good side the book gives detailed information about who played what on "The Idiot" and has a very nice lay-out. And for everyone who seeks a summary of all that's been written about that phase in Bowie's career this is a rather complete work. But for everyone who expects a far more informed and intelligent insight from an author who knows his subject beyond copying and paisting this is a disappointment. And it would have been interesting to get more. Shame.


(cracked actor)
07/07/08 01:13 PM
Re: Bowie In Berlin - The Book You Don't Need new [re: EJ]  

After reading your post I've come to a couple of conclusions:

A. You should have advised Seabrook

B. You should write your own Bowie in Berlin book.

I think you have many points that would make a book like that very interesting and not just a run of the mill rock-n-roll book.

I like the idea of interviewing various people from that time and place and even interviewing people of the modern circle like Gail Ann Dorsey. To get a sense of what it means to him now to have been in Berlin is to see the overall affect on him.

I think Seabrook meant well but it would have been better if he actually went to Berlin and got some facts about the locale as you mentioned. Have you read the 33 1/3 book about Low? How does that compare?

Thanks for the review and I can't wait for your book!

(cracked actor)
07/07/08 06:56 PM
Re: Bowie In Berlin - The Book You Don't Need new [re: ghostlove]  

I think the author knew the title, "Bowie In Berlin," was intriguing enough so that the contents of the book almost didn't matter.

07/08/08 02:01 AM
Re: Bowie In Berlin - The Book You Don't Need new [re: EJ]  

I flicked through this book in a store last year and figured I should buy it at some point...Not so sure about it now.

It's kinda amazing how poorly-researched some music books are that get published. Gimme Danger: The Iggy Pop Story by Joe Ambrose is probably the worst rock bio I've ever read - basically a cut 'n' paste job from interviews, laced with amazing factual inaccuracies and brain-dead opinions on the part of the author (who's not a fan of Bowie - or Iggy, come to that). I posted a scathing review of the book on Amazon, but it got truncated.

Ben Myers' John Lydon: The Sex Pistols, PiL and Anti-Celebrity was another disappointment - the material was almost entirely lifted verbatim from the Fodderstompf website.

07/08/08 04:00 AM
Post of the week new [re: EJ]  

Did you write this whole review just for TW?
In that case, I'm with ghostlove, you should write your own Bowie in Berlin bio.
Your post was the best reading I have had in recent years (despite not having read the book).

It's LABRYNTH, idiot!

(byroad singer)
07/08/08 07:56 AM
Re: Post of the week new [re: Emil]  

Thanks for the positive reactions, folks.

I indeed wrote this just for TW, but the word "just" is wrong and it should be replaced by "especially".

And if I ever get enough money and spare time to do such a book myself I'll do it. But I doubt that it will happen.

In reply to:

(ghostlove) Have you read the 33 1/3 book about Low? How does that compare?

No, I haven't. I wasn't even aware it exists.

@ Ziggfried: For the Pistols story John Lydon's "No Blacks, No Dogs, No Irish" is highly recommendable and so is Julien Temple's film (DVD) "The Filth And The Fury".


(electric tomato)
07/08/08 10:11 AM
Re: Post of the week new [re: EJ]  

In reply to:

In reply to:

(ghostlove) Have you read the 33 1/3 book about Low? How does that compare?

No, I haven't. I wasn't even aware it exists.

I've got the Low 33 1/3 book. It's a while since I read it but I remember it favourably, though I couldn't be sure it contains a lot of new information. Also, Gimme Danger should have been called Dirt.

Everyday I write the book

(wild eyed peoploid)
07/08/08 02:51 PM
Re: Bowie In Berlin - The Book You Don't Need new [re: EJ]  

I bought this book and quite liked it. It concentrates more on the technicalities of the songs and how they were recorded rather than his personal life, so one gets an idea how he formulates his own ideas and what methods he used and still uses to this day whilst in the studio.

I'll tell you a book you shouldn't read.... Hello Spaceboy by Dave Thompson. I was so disappointed as this is really the first proper bio that concentrates on his career and life post 1984 and all the guy seemed to have done was read the same newspaper articles and interviews as I did because there was very little in there I didn't already know. I don't think he was able to get many personal accounts and anecdotes so information was very sparse. Don't waste your time with that book.

07/08/08 11:02 PM
Re: Post of the week new [re: theidiot2]  

In reply to:

Gimme Danger should have been called Dirt.

I've noticed an annoying trend in musical bios of rock stars Bowie has collaborated with - namely, the propensity of the author to slag Bowie off and make frankly ridiculous judgements of the man. In Gimme Danger, Joe Ambrose criticises Bowie throughout and makes the claim that Bowie "never strayed from British mainstream pop" or something like that. I read a Lou Reed biography years ago (I think it was called Waiting for the Man) and the author claimed that, unlike Lou Reed, Bowie never rearranged the styles of his songs from one tour to the other (!!). Even Victor Bockris' otherwise excellent Lou Reed: The Biography makes the ill-advised claim that time has judged Reed's Rock & Roll Heart album as being superior to Bowie's Station To Station, released in the same year. You might be the only person who got on that boat, Victor...

(electric tomato)
07/08/08 11:45 PM
Re: Post of the week new [re: ziggfried]  

The 33 1/3 book on 'Low' is indeed excellent. Sheds a lot of new light on the production of 'The Idiot' as well, which is a bonus.

On the other hand, while 'Gimme Danger' was most definitely gutter trash, Paul Trynka's superb 'Open Up And Bleed' (indeed the definitive Iggy bio), actually presents Bowie in a very favourable light. In fact, the blurb on the book's back cover actually stakes claim to "dispelling the myths" surrounding Daddy and Pop's "often misunderstood" relationship.

'Hallo Spaceboy' on the otherhand isn't anything special, though the lay out is pretty neat and it's illustrated extensively with photographs throughout, though it would've been far nicer if more were in colour.

I used to be with it, but then they changed what "it" was. Now, what I'm with isn't it, and what's "it" seems weird and scary to me.

Pages in this thread: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | (show all)
*Threaded Mode
Jump to

Teenage Wildlife Davie Bowie | Email Us! Forums powered by WWWThreads v5.1.5perl

Teenage Wildlife Home Page Bowie's music Info on Bowie Other Media Have your say! Search the Site Help me!

Toolbar (Interact)

Etete Systems