In reply to:
I only wrote in the third person as Sysiyo had indicated he was unable to decipher what comments in my post referred to without the aid of quotations.
Otherwise all well and good, miss, but I never said that. My exact words were "You should learn to use the quote function my dear", where I was referring to single sentence of your writing that I could not place in it's proper context. If you are, indeed, a member on several other message boards as you claim, you should know the differentce between 'quote function' and 'quotations'.
There are two possible outcomes from your inability understand this difference: your grasp of the english language is really very poor (as already illusitrated in Starlite's post, concerning your inability to understand the proper meaning of words like 'perfection'), in which case I'd recommend you return to that school you spoke so disparagingly, and pay more attention during the english classes. It's a rather useful language, you know.
The possible outcome is that this is, again, an example of your attempting to rewrite history so that it'll better fit to what you're trying to say now. Unfortunately (for yourself), this time it was not one of your own meanings you attempted to alter, but one of my posts. You might have heard of a concept called 'truth' sometime in your pitiful life. And I'm not talking of truth in the philosophical sense, I'm talking of truth as in what has passed. Thanks to this being a message board, we have explict written records of everything that has passed during the course of this argument. You cannot claim to have said a thing different from what you really said, unless you also alter the original post accordingly. Again, I find you displaying such fascist (or, actually in this case stalinist) traits you accused me of. (Interestingly, would this make me Hitler and you Stalin?).
In reply to:
As mentioned, it's your assumption I've chosen to emphasise the definite article in my username; not my intention. Thus, the rest of that unpleasant rant you posted is irrelevant.
It is not. You see, you could (should) have written 'the Poet', not 'The Poet'. And once again, you claim to do one thing when your conduct suggests another. And your cunduct is so strong you cannot really hide what you really are like.
On a side note, is this excellent argumentation an example of the "definitive" arguments by which you've held an upper hand "from the outset" (direct quotes from yourself)? Because it's certainly not very convincing. Again, your inability to formulate arguments longer than three sentences utterly limits your ability to actually argue. The only arguments you present against what Starlite said are ones that are either contradicted by your behaviour (see above), ones of which we could have no previous knowledge about (and hence as far as we know, you might have made up), and your entire conduct against illusitrates the fact you do not properly grasp the english language.
In reply to:
Make another attempt to justify your evident stupidity on me, and I promise I won't respond*.
To tell the truth, I think this is a bit counter-productive from you, and it would indeed seem to me you have given up.
First of all, I never requested you to stop replying to me (I might have told you to 'go to hell', but that is once again an entirely different matter). As I have repeatedly stated, I am immensely enjoying your conversation, and would be very sad if it stopped.
Second, your sudden decision to stop replying to me would to my eyes seem to illusitrate the fact that you simply no longer know how to counter my arguments. In my previous post and this one, I have illusitrated the facts that you:
(1) Are unable to follow rules and have limited grasp on why they exist,
(2) Are selfish enough to post in the wrong forum when you knew you were posting in the wrong forum,
(3) Are unable to deal with negative criticism,
(4) Are probably a sixteen-year-old angsty goth girl, despite your claim to the opposite,
(5) Have failed in your aim to entertain us with you poetry,
(6a) Are either unable to properly understand the english language, or
(6b) Have attempted to re-write the past course of this conversation so that it would seem you have "had the definitive word from the outset".
Additionally, you took Hannibal_Lecter (a clear alter ego if there ever was one) seriously, displaying stupidity of a degree hitherto unseen on these forums.
KArt | Project Michelangelo | LiveJournal