In reply to:

---

I'm not really surprised that you'd say that, considering it has no grounding in reality and is only designed to annoy me

---

I imagine that's your approach to all criticism. "Oh, wow, but he's only saying that to annoy me, because they're couldn't possibly be any grain of truth in it, seen as I'm perfect".

If you can't see how
(a) posting long post after long post complaining about how other posters suck and this place sucks in your usual tedious style with only the occasional relief of a post related to the minutae of your daily life that could only be of possible interest to those who know you intimately
(b) jumping straight down the throat of any new poster you feel is trying to upstage you, with grammar corrections even when you lack the expertise to be right, "You're an obvious alter" accusations and exhortations on how to post so that they might better please you
(c) repeating over and over the same few "in jokes" about regulars that were never that funny to start with

might suck the fun out of this place for a lot of people, well, then, I guess there's not much I can do to help you.

In reply to:

---

Sort of, but isn't the main thrust of these arguments always quantity rather than quality?

---

You post way more than you should too, you know, given that you have little or nothing left to say, and lack the grace to say that little in entertaining fashion. See SLC's comment for further evidence.

In reply to:

---

you've only got to wade through another 400 or so posts from me

---

Or you could do us a favour and stick a fork in your posting career. It's been dead a long time anyway, apart from the occasional entertaining fight.


""Looking for love, not sex" -- the tagline of many a troll who doesn't believe they are worthy or capable of sex in its own right, but god, the thought of carrying that sort of middling self-esteem all the way to 36 is disturbing."