In reply to:

---

Schizo: I really, really, really wish this didn't result in PHOENIX leaving (again), but I honestly think she made the right decision.

---

Except that she didn't though, did she? Ohramona FUCKED UP, hence:

In reply to:

---

ohrodoh!: edit. Okay, he tried to rectify it but wasn't able too. This one will slide cause I already said it would.

---

Which is precisely why she's in the mess she's in now. Ohro never checked that Dogz's deleted post did indeed leave an icky skidmark on the 'inbred' thread and has subsequently been back-peddling with 'Oh, I'd let you have another chance. ' And then she proceeded to lie several times about going out on a limb with wayward decision making, ergo:

In reply to:

---

ohro: You didn't complain when I made the decision to instate a limit without conference.

---

I MYSELF conferred with YOU on its appropriateness for the very fact it was impossible for a dingbat like Dogz to miscount a number as low as five ESPECIALLY in less than a week into his restriction - as opposed to the trickier seven. On this point and all the other conditions to be met surrounding Dogz's ban, the forum was unanimous.

In reply to:

---

You didn't complain when I banned b_mardle's IP without conference.

---

This is also a lie. My 'Freedom of Information' thread divulged the fact from several posters that various moderators had indeed conferred on this topic, as had the administrator Adam.*****

In reply to:

---

You didn't complain when K gave Wraith2 a custom title without having met the customary requirement --not only without conference--but in direct opposition to my response. Neither did I, I'm sure you noticed.

---

Well, here's a clue: Posters in the past (dukewhite & dice, et al.) have claimed custom titles before hitting the 5000 target without opposition from fellow posters. No one SERIOUSLY considers the duty of conferring titles to be the equivalent of deciding whether to ban a poster, despite it being among your most important duties.

And actually, yes you did complain with about as much seriousness as the situation warranted.

In reply to:

---

X bozos removed

---

Ah, I see Pablo's had a spate of activity. No doubt my response here is jeopardised by ignoring his carefully crafted arguments, so instead I'll opt for a blanket rebuttal:

In reply to:

---

ghostlove:

---

Jeez, the defence rests its case?

Naturally, I wanted to make this post much longer, exposing the intricacies of whatever arguments were being had, but there weren't any. However, I'll provide a summary version:

1) Ohro FUCKED UP
2) Ohro LIED
3) Ohro gets to cosset herself with a flood of Dogz's forward emails and tales about Pablum's rare 'Loving the Alien' vinyl and Shake 'n' Vac disasters.

**** I've been asked to clarify this point, on which I quote anisette:

In reply to:

---

I forwarded the IP address to Adam and the ohso honorable ohro, and they banned the IP.

---

[neon]I'm not trolling; I'm moderating. [/neon]

Edited by Auntie Prism on 08/15/06 05:39 PM (server time).