In reply to:
I've had disagreements with PP in the past, but I get on reasonably well with him now
Yeah; I love it how in the Official Warning thread you're supporting Prism for attacking Pabsy but now you're attacking Prism and professing a fondness for the twat.
I guess there's a high turnover in dossier files! If not, I'd love to see the Shyster, Positively Identified As... section!
In reply to:
(though he seems to be somewhat on the outer here now).
He was never on the inner, Stuie (and doesn't want to be, as he'll no doubt respond to this saying): amazingly, TW has never taken to supercillious, humourless nonces with superiority complexes and an inability to get laid in a brothel staffed by blind prostitutes.
For a notorious grudge holder like you, he must have driven you wild in one of those infamous BWW circle jerks to make you change your mind.
In reply to:
As I've just said on another thread, I don't actually post here anymore, so I don't really care.
You know, I know what you mean: as I was somewhere between your fifth and twelth response to Monkeyboy over the last day or so (all of which were bloody hilarious, by the way), I thought: You know, Stu never posts here anymore.
And really, Stu: I only brought you back here to sic you onto dogz. Attacking the Germans, Strawman, Monkeyboy, me (give him 5 minutes) and anyone else that posted in between your entries (which, if I haven't already mentioned, have been bloody hilarious), well... that wasn't part of the deal, Stu.
That wasn't part!
Deny your culture of consumption; This is a culture of destruction
|