Congratulations on reading and correctly ascertaining part of the meaning of the first sentance of my post, Pabs.
I understand you're probably still taking a breather from that gargantuan cognitive effort, so I'll explain that later in the post I refer to the length of time Stu usually holds grudges; people that may have disagreed with Stu's point in a thread created in 2001 are still considered to be evil henchmen under the control of a nefarious (then) teenager from the north of England who hasn't posted here regularly for 3 years.
Also I made a really subtle reference to you performing homosexual acts upon him (don't worry, I said it for the benefit of the more intellectual readers of this thread; I knew you and dogz would miss it) because, you know, it's funny to conjure the image of a 50 year old virgin with a pervert moustache giving a reach-around to a scary old paranoid schizophrenic who considers himself to be an undiscovered literary genius and proves that by making the same (bloody hilarious) jokes on a message board (which he doesn't post at) for days at a time.
In reply to:
you are so fond of relying on the past to bring some sort of foundation to your shaky arguments.
Get lucky on your second visit to the blind prostitutes then?
Deny your culture of consumption;
This is a culture of destruction