In reply to:

---

Well there's a surprize, call me all you wish, it matters not, i am above all the silliness of name calling.

---

Unfortunatly you are not above the sillyness of trying to write posts...

I hope you are aware that it is really, really difficult to talk about defending some etiquette when this includes tolerating members who don't know a shit about etiquette.

The idea of not banning you bases on the same foundations as the whole five-posts idea. Reducing your posts in the coffeeshop to a smaller number is just some kind of simulating a basic sense for filtering one's output, which you don't have.

While on the one hand it is certainly a quality to be able to stand things thrown at one, on the other hand there is also the need for some sense of "Why are those things thrown?" and "Perhaps I deserve it."

All in all you make it very hard to ask people for a way of posting which includes tolerating the way you argue, write your posts, express yourself and forget about friend and enemy when discussing.

Just look at this discussion - EJ is clearly on the same side as you, he told you to shut up and he told why he told you to shut up. Do shut up? Do you even give a shit about the reason he told you to keep quiet? When reading your post - or perhaps already when seing your username in this thread I immediatly had to think "Please, dear Evan in the sky, make Monkeyboy or R/R appear to deal with issue so the others can think about more interestig things to do than trying to argue with someone simply refusing any logic and therefore being completly immune towards every kind of serious arguing."


Liest das denn keiner außer mir?